Hi Raman,

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Raminderjeet Singh <[email protected]
> wrote:

> See my comments inline.
>
> Thanks
> Raminder
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > I am thinking of improving the usability of the document registration
> > (host,service,deployement) to make the life easier for the Science
> gateway
> > users.
> +1. Yes we need to improve user experience as users normally get lost with
> multistep process. A simple form should definitely help with less buttons
> and pop up menus to fill some information.
> >
> > Users will fill out only one form not 3, User simply have to register a
> > service ...
> >
> > User will tell what is the input parameters looks like (parameter
> Name/type
> > - comes from a drop down)
> For user point of view its application with input and output parameters.
> We create a web-service for application, which is internal to Airavata
> architecture.
> >
> > We will make it optional to register the host description, so we will
> > defined the host descriptions for the given set of Super computers, users
> > just have to select from a dropdown, if user adds a new one it will pick
> it
> > from the registry and will be displayed in the dropdown.
> With a option for the user to view/update the information if needed and
> add there local clusters. Some of the endpoints are updated over time or
> additional endpoints are added.
> >
> > Then user will tell where is the actual script located in the grid
> > (Executable location).
> >
> > User doesn't have to give any scratch location (If user want it can be
> > configured but by default user doesn't have to ) We will derive a scratch
> > location (temporary location to store the inputs/outputs) from the given
> > script location. (In the UI we need to show the derived temp location..
> if
> > user doesn't want that location to be the temp location users simply have
> > to edit it)
> +1 very much needed as it again GFAC requirement not user application
> requirement.
> >
> > User have to give the RSL parameter, more specifically the project Name
> ...
> > other parameter will be filled based no the selected host.. But mostly we
> > expect users to fill out the Queue Name, Job type etc.
> All these important parameter need to be exposed at workflow level also as
> based on input/problem size user can define where he want to run its
> application using how many processes and queue name. There are some
> additional RSL parameters like Job name, email id, email params etc can be
> also very useful to user.
>
Can you please point me to all the RSL parameters users can configure ? I
don't think current XBaya UI has everything.

Lahiru

>
> >
> > If you have any concern about this please provide some input...
> Currently if user submits a job and want to kill the running job user need
> to login to resource to kill the job. Xbaya should have a service to kill
> the running job.
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Lahiru
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > System Analyst Programmer
> > PTI Lab
> > Indiana University
>
>


-- 
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University

Reply via email to