Hi,

I have submitted my proposal for "Workflow Debugging Framework for Apache
Airavata". It would be great, if i can have Any feedback regarding the
proposal.

Thanks.
Hasitha Aravinda.


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Suresh Marru <sma...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Hasitha,
>
> Can you please comment on the issue -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-343 with any questions or
> comments? Do you need any help while you work on the GSOC student proposal?
>
> Suresh
>
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Hasitha Aravinda wrote:
>
> > Hi, Suresh and Saminda.
> >
> > Thank you for your guidance and giving more details about this feature.
> > Hope I can start with this. I very much appreciate your support.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Hasitha Aravinda
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Suresh Marru <sma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Thats a good elaboration Saminda. I just would like to add that Airavata
> >> Workflow System running in local execution mode (called Dynamic
> Execution)
> >> has some of these features already. And XBaya UI has semantics on how to
> >> put break points and stop/restart workflow. These were well received
> before.
> >>
> >> Back to the GSOC goals, the Airavata workflow engine executing in server
> >> mode, where workflow is launched to the server and interpreted at the
> >> server. So this makes this task pretty interesting, from a client (XBaya
> >> GUI or a web portal), the server should support interactivity exposed
> >> through the web service interface. The user can think of advanced staff
> >> like open a prompt and issue commands to execute against a running
> instance.
> >>
> >> Hi Hasitha,
> >>
> >> Sorry if these details are overwhelming to start with, but do not worry,
> >> once you get started and run some static workflows these will start to
> make
> >> more sense. We will be happy to elaborate in detail and walk you
> through as
> >> you go along.
> >>
> >> Suresh
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 15, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for your interest Hasitha. I've updated the jira [1] with some
> >>> details on some of the functionalities we could expect from this
> feature.
> >>> Please feel free to comment on them on the jira or over this mail
> thread.
> >>> The specific details are flexible based on the implementation & time
> >>> constraints.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks & Regards,
> >>> Saminda
> >>>
> >>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-343
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Hasitha Aravinda
> >>> <mail.hasith...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks Suresh.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, it is better if I can have more details about this feature. So I
> >> can
> >>>> further study about necessary technologies and related works on this.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> --
> >>>> Hasitha Aravinda
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Suresh Marru <sma...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Hasitha,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you for your interest on this project. This is an interesting
> >>>>> feature which will open ways for us not only to debug workflows but
> >> also
> >>>> to
> >>>>> connect to running instances and allow us to steer the already
> >> executing
> >>>>> workflows. Saminda Wijerante is mentoring this project and I will let
> >> him
> >>>>> chime in with more details.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Suresh
> >>>>> On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Hasitha Aravinda wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My name is Hasitha Aravinda, an Undergraduate student studying
> >> Computer
> >>>>>> Science and Engineering. I am interesting in this new feature. I'm
> >>>>>> currently studying Airavata and Airavata Workflow model and have
> rough
> >>>>>> understanding about the current implementation. So I would like to
> >> work
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>> this as my GSoC 2012 project.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Suggestions on the approach that I have to take and Additional
> >>>>>> details/materials I should follow are very much appreciated.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks & Regards.
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> *Hasitha Aravinda*,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to