Hi Ross & Ate, Thanks for catching this stupid mistake of mine. You are indeed right, Chris voted on the RC2 [1]. I will send out a correction to the general mailing list. And appreciate you both looking at the release that should give the needed IPMC votes.
Suresh [1] - http://markmail.org/message/faiqgun7n3ajbn2i On Jun 19, 2012, at 6:52 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thanks Ate, I'll continue my own evaluation then, just in case Chris' > vote doesn't count against RC3. I too find no problems so far. Will > complete my checks this afternoon (UK time) > > Ross > > On 19 June 2012 11:44, Ate Douma <[email protected]> wrote: >> I had seen Chris vote +1 on this list and presumed it was for the >> 0.3-incubating RC3. >> >> However, now that you brought this up, I notice Chris actually voted on the >> earlier RC*2* version ... >> I'm not sure which one Chris validated although the timing of his email >> might presume it actually concerned the RC3 version. >> >> At any rate, this confusion shows one of (multiple of) the problems I see >> when re-spinning a same release version candidate. Build time / local maven >> repository artifact conflicts and resolution being a potential other one. >> >> I'd rather prefer that for a failed/canceled release candidate its version >> (tag) to be considered used (and tained) instead of being recycled for a >> next RC. Meaning, a new release candidate should preferably get a new >> version tag. >> >> Ate >> >> p.s. I expect to vote (+1) on this RC3 on the general@ shortly, almost done >> testing. >> >> >> On 06/19/2012 11:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> >>> The vote record indicates a vote from Chirs Mattemann, but I don't see >>> his vote in my mail. Is this my error or yours? >>> >>> Ross >>> >>> On 17 June 2012 23:12, Suresh Marru<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The community vote has now closed with the following results: >>>> >>>> IPMC Members/Mentors: >>>> +1 [2] >>>> >>>> 0 [0] >>>> -1 [0] >>>> >>>> Airavata PPMC Members: >>>> +1 [5] >>>> 0 [0] >>>> -1 [0] >>>> >>>> Community Votes: >>>> +1 [3] >>>> 0 [0] >>>> -1 [0] >>>> >>>> The vote is ****successful**** >>>> >>>> Voting Record: >>>> Bhathiya Jayasekara +1 >>>> Hasitha Aravinda +1 >>>> Milinda Pathirage +1 >>>> + Heshan Suriyaarachchi +1 >>>> + Saminda Wijeratne + 1 >>>> + Marlon Pierce + 1 >>>> +^ Suresh Marru + 1 >>>> + Lahiru Gunathilake + 1 >>>> *^ Chris Mattmann + 1 >>>> >>>> + Denotes Airavata PPMC member >>>> * Denotes Airavata Mentor >>>> ^ Denotes IPMC member >>>> >>>> On Jun 10, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: >>>> >>>> Apache Airavata (Incubating) is pleased to call for a vote on the >>>> following >>>> Apache Airavata 0.3-incubating release candidate artifacts: >>>> >>>> Detailed change log/release notes: >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/tags/airavata-0.3-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES >>>> >>>> All Release Artifacts: >>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.3-incubating/RC3/ >>>> >>>> PGP release keys (signed using 617DDBAD): >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/KEYS >>>> >>>> Specific URL's: >>>> >>>> SVN source tag (1348704): >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/tags/airavata-0.3-incubating/ >>>> >>>> Source release: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.3-incubating/RC3/airavata-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip >>>> >>>> Binary Artifacts: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.3-incubating/RC3/apache-airavata-0.3-incubating-bin.tar.gz >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.3-incubating/RC3/apache-airavata-0.3-incubating-bin.zip >>>> >>>> Maven staging repo: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheairavata-220/ >>>> >>>> Please verify the artifacts and vote. The vote will be open for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
