You are right Peter but who is it that makes AIR Policy? The AIR of course.
Let's not have members mouthing off on behalf of the AIR. We could form an action group and then elect Mike Sobotta as spokesman.
 
That is the democratic way
 
Kevin Power
----- Original Message -----
To: AIRNEWS
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:33 PM
Subject: RE: [AIRNEWS] Sydney Morning Herald 7/10/02 'Searching for trouble'

No question the AIR needs a position. But "the AIR" position?  Shouldn't that be "our" position? We should be careful not to abdicate responsibilities under the cloak of "them". At the end of the day, if the "them" are left with all the responsibility for action without your input, them you will wear the consequences (and the AIR is "us" not "them"). You are right! What a great PR position to present a responsible response to this. How do you think "we" should proceed?
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Sobotta
Sent: Monday, 7 October 2002 11:50 AM
To: AIRNEWS
Subject: [AIRNEWS] Sydney Morning Herald 7/10/02 'Searching for trouble'

Does the AIR have a position on full body CT 'screening' examinations? What a nice article to get some publicity for radiographers standing up for the public in our position as 'defenders against aberrant radiation doses'!
 
I for one would like to see at least a letter to the editor from the AIR stating their position. I would also be interested to see if there are any rads subscribing to AIRNEWS that perform these CTs. Is it under pressure from radiologist? Personal investment?
mike sobotta
 
 

Reply via email to