you know the funny thing is now that Ive read that that makes alot more
sense, but I dont think i would have thought to do it that way
either...
I probably wouldve jumped straight to retrieving the image from my
database and sending it down the pipe through ajax...

not that i do alot of storing images in databases I dont think its the
best method of storing images.

Now here is the question do you think there is more data beign
transferred from the server by using ajax or bythe aspx page outputting
the image?

I think a test should be done to see which is faster / more expensive


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ajax.NET Professional" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro

The latest downloads of Ajax.NET Professional can be found at 
http://www.ajaxpro.info
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to