Hi,

this is fixed. The bug occured only when Server.Transfer was used,
something you don't want to use with Ajax applications.

Regards,
Michael

On 6/14/06, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All - Question for the board:
>
> In trying to get up to speed on the updates and improvements between
> the Ajax.Net and the AjaxPro.net frameworks I stumbled upon this post:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro/browse_frm/thread/e59c53bd5943ab75/4e5d7c2a1e06d227?q=onerror&rnum=17#4e5d7c2a1e06d227
>
> which discusses a "huge memory leak" problem with the way the AjaxPro
> framework adds the javascript for the page to a static hashtable,
> _keyed on the Page object.  The post even references some testing from
> the ASP.NET team about this.
>
> Can anyone shed some light on this please?  Has this been addressed and
> fixed in recent newer versions?  Was/is this a problem with legacy ajax
> applications running the Ajax.Net framework?  Is the work-around posted
> a viable option to fix this problem? etc...
>
> thanks in advance!
> Kevin
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Best regards | Schöne Grüße
Michael

Microsoft MVP - Most Valuable Professional
Microsoft MCAD - Certified Application Developer

http://weblogs.asp.net/mschwarz/
http://www.schwarz-interactive.de/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ajax.NET Professional" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro

The latest downloads of Ajax.NET Professional can be found at 
http://www.ajaxpro.info
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to