[ajaxpro] Re: JavaScript libraries comparison

Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:13:49 -0700

I have primarily used Dojo and I completely agree with most of the comments so far. The Dojo library is very powerful, and perhaps comes with too many extra features, however, that is just my opinion. The library is several MB's large.
But truly I have nothing but good things to say about the actual functionality, it has been fantastic, I just wish it was better documented.
Matan Mazursky

On 6/9/06, JasonBunting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Michael,

I use MochiKit because it stays out of my way and let's me get work
done quicker. It is not a framework, per se, so there are no 'widgets'
like those you can create with Dojo, for instance. The other thing I
like about it is that it plays well with any other _javascript_ library
because, unlike prototype, it does not mess around with the built-in
_javascript_ object. Libraries/frameworks should not extend things using
object.prototype . . . .

All of the other ones are nice but I prefer the functional approach of
MochiKit - it is well thought-out and the documentation is amazing when
compared to any of the other libraries/frameworks in your list.



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ajax.NET Professional" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro

The latest downloads of Ajax.NET Professional can be found at http://www.ajaxpro.info
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to