I think anyone using your library understands...because that means they are also writing JavaScript...and are forced to deal with a bunch of "things" because of different browsers. Anyways, thanks for the library it works great....
So I've got this idea...tell me where my logic is wrong or why nobody else has brought up anything similar. We have an administration portal here that we log into and monitor the system. Now there are a number of different "proccesses" going on that are created by our clients. Currently we monitor these from one page, there are about 15 different "progress bars". I use your library to get the status of each proccess and resize some images to mimic a progress bar. This is one example of the different things I've got going on this dashboard. There can be "MANY" Ajax calls queued up depending on what web parts they have showing. So lets say I've got 30 tiny requests (AjaxMethods that return integers or what not) queued up. Instead of having 30 individual calls to the server (which is the most expensive part as far as time consuming) what if there some kind of RequestBus (I don't know what to call it). So we do something like: AjaxPro.CreateBus(2000); <-- create a bus that contacts the server every 2000 milliseconds. Then I could do something like: Ajaxpro.Bus.Add(new AjaxRequestOrSomethingWithACallback); So I could queue up a bunch of requests, and those get executed on the server every two seconds (if there are any queued up), but all at once (although I assume all the callbacks would get called sequentially because of the two thread constraint). Does that make sense? This would be great in my dashboard example because the data doesn't have to be "real time", I need to show the updated data but not ASAP. While I understand that I couldn't have all 30 callbacks being executed at the same time, it would still only make one trip to the server. I hope I am explaining my self enough for you to understand. This concept wouldn't be benefitial for any of our other pages, but our dashboard and other pages that utilize web parts would benefit. Any ideas, suggestions, or insults? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ajax.NET Professional" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro The latest downloads of Ajax.NET Professional can be found at http://www.ajaxpro.info -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
