Correct, but as in my answer before you can write a
JavaScriptConverter, then you can use any argument for your class.
Regards,
Michael
On 6/30/06, Keith Mackay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that the specs for a serializable object prevents the
> serialization of any object whose constructor takes parameters.
> Sorry...
>
>
> On 6/30/06, Jim R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > First, thanks for the great library.
> >
> > Just fyi,
> >
> > I ran into an issue when trying to pass a custom class back to the
> > server. If I override the default constructor to use some parameters
> > the class comes back as null to the client. To reproduce you can
> > replace this line in the MyAjaxClass.cs in the starter kit:
> >
> > public MyAjaxClass()
> > {
> > }
> >
> > with
> >
> > public MyAjaxClass(string test)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > It threw me for a few hours because I am new to the library and
> > thought I was doing something wrong (maybe I was).
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Best regards | Schöne Grüße
Michael
Microsoft MVP - Most Valuable Professional
Microsoft MCAD - Certified Application Developer
http://weblogs.asp.net/mschwarz/
http://www.schwarz-interactive.de/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ajax.NET Professional" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro
The latest downloads of Ajax.NET Professional can be found at
http://www.ajaxpro.info
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
