Tarpoon wrote:
<snip> > The obvious question is; why not use a StringBuilder instead of > appending characters to a string? A quick test shows us: > > Appending 8192 characters; > using string += char: 46,845ms > using StringBuilder.Append: 0ms (0 ticks) > > When this is done a few times during a request, considerable time is > wasted. > > I would like to know if it is possible to resolve this issue in the > near future? See, this is a *perfect* illustration of why this project would do well to be open source - other people can review the code and update it to make it better. But since Michael insists on keeping the source code closed (yes, he has released source code in the past, but a true open source project would allow us to see the current source always and submit patches), the project, and thus the users thereof, don't get that benefit and instead must wait for him to make changes. What is the real reason he doesn't open source it? Pride? Afraid someone might find some glaring errors? It really would be such a better project if it were open source. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ajax.NET Professional" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro The latest downloads of Ajax.NET Professional can be found at http://www.ajaxpro.info/ Don't forget to read my blog at http://weblogs.asp.net/mschwarz/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
