If it is a "simple" class there is no real need, only if you want to add some methods on the object that will be available on the client-side JavaScript. See the DataTable converter which will have several methods like table.Add.
Regards, Michael On 10/3/06, dimkaspb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have just tried it with a "simple" object and it worked. > My other object is in fact fairly complicated with various DB support > for ORM so I can see why it would reach a stack overflow. > > In general, what would I use converters for if returning a custom > (simple) class works fine? > > Thanks again, > Dima > > > > > -- Best regards | Schöne Grüße Michael Microsoft MVP - Most Valuable Professional Microsoft MCAD - Certified Application Developer http://weblogs.asp.net/mschwarz/ http://www.schwarz-interactive.de/ Skype: callto:schwarz-interactive MSN IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ajax.NET Professional" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ajaxpro The latest downloads of Ajax.NET Professional can be found at http://www.ajaxpro.info/ Don't forget to read my blog at http://weblogs.asp.net/mschwarz/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
