I was actually meaning to advocate for keeping staging, but telling people to base their code off of that instead of master. With staging we can rollback and modify commits if necessary. With master we can't (or shouldn't at least).
On Thursday, November 12, 2015, barret rhoden <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-11-12 at 12:26 Kevin Klues wrote: > > Since staging was introduced, I basically ignore master and do all of > > my work off of staging instead. > > yeah, thinking about it a bit, the odds of anyone actually catching a > bug on staging in the day or two a commit sits there is pretty low. so > far, i've caught one, but that's it. given the massive number of bugs > we already have, it's just not worth the hassle. > > so forget about staging. > > barret > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Akaros" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:;>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:;>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- ~Kevin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akaros" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
