My off-source guess is that there might be a traceme flag in the struct proc we are not cloning correctly at exec() time. On Jan 26, 2016 20:13, "ron minnich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:37 PM 'Davide Libenzi' via Akaros < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Oh, IC. >> BTW, looking at syspipe(), it seems to have the >> rely-on-values-written-after-waserror issue. >> >> >> > Thanks, I'll take a look :-) > > If you can, could you see if you can see what I'm missing on inheriting > strace after exec? > > The issue is that > strace /bin/date > seems only to show the exec system call, and nothing more. I'm missing > something! > > ron > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Akaros" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akaros" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
