We should probably at least throw a print in there...

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Barret Rhoden <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Once we start using the SRATs for something, we'll need to parse the extra
> ones.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kern/drivers/dev/acpi.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kern/drivers/dev/acpi.c b/kern/drivers/dev/acpi.c
> index 66ab1a08e552..13ffce965f5a 100644
> --- a/kern/drivers/dev/acpi.c
> +++ b/kern/drivers/dev/acpi.c
> @@ -847,8 +847,9 @@ static struct Atable *parsesrat(struct Atable *parent,
>         int i;
>         struct Srat *st;
>
> +       /* TODO: Parse the second SRAT */
>         if (srat != NULL)
> -               panic("acpi: two SRATs?\n");
> +               return NULL;
>
>         t = mkatable(parent, SRAT, name, p, rawsize, 0);
>         slice_init(&slice);
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Akaros" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Akaros" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to