On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Roland Kuhn <[email protected]> wrote:
> The idea with actors is that they shall remain responsive whenever > possible. Another way to look at it is that the internal queue (or stash) > should be limited, and when it overflows you might want to send a negative > reply right away. For that the actor needs to be runnable while the Future > executes. > Thinking about it, most of my usecases of actors using futures are related to IO and other cases that I hope will be handled by reactive streams. Thanks, Daniel -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
