Hi all. I'm trying a hot swap between an active processor and a backup one, in line with the this<https://www.assembla.com/spaces/akka/tickets/3938#/activity/ticket:> ticket, to avoid delay while swapping huge actors.
I'm thinking about manually sending my commands to two different actors in a active/passive fashion. In case of node failure I'd like to point out to the passive instance, avoiding startup delay. I'm thinking about having two sharding regions and then, after node failure and using a particular sharding strategy, point out to the node where the passive object is. Maybe the hotswap (as decribed here<http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/snapshot/java/untyped-actors.html#untypedactor-hotswap>) can be used to deviate the commands to passive actor. In the meanwhile the standard Akka persistence scheme is being used to re-initiate the original actor that could be used later after a new node failure. Do you think that this approach is feasible or maybe there is another simpler way to achieve this behavior? Many thanks for your help. Eduardo. -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to akka-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to akka-user@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
