Martin, Thank you very much for your most interesting and useful post.
I think many of us benefit considerably from you sharing your practical experience with Akka Persistence and CQRS. It's probably too early for "best practices" but knowing what may work well (or not) in real-world applications is invaluable. Of course, thanks to the others in the Akka team and Greg as well. Cheers, Ashley. On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 12:31:15 UTC+8, Martin Krasser wrote: > > Whether to go for a 1:1 approach or a 1:n approach (or a partitioned m:n > approach where m << n) really depends on the concrete use case and > non-functional requirements. Your example might be a good candidate for a > 1:1 approach (see also further comments inline) but there are also examples > for which a 1:n or m:n approach is a better choice. Here are some general > influencing factors: > ... -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
