> > On top of that - of course we will continue to POC. > As I mentioned we are confident with Akka and using it's advantages BUT > since we are new to Akka, we had some debate and one argument was "let NLB > do what it knows and let the application do it's part". > Because that we understand (think :)) that Akka should be capable on > delivering the inter load balancing - we just wanted to get > some strengthening from the Experts and Experienced before/while continuing > to the POC. > In general - yes, Akka is able to balance load in a cluster by utilising it's own routers. Like I mentioned before, if you need in depth consulting, we can do that as part of a commercial offering - http://typesafe.com/how/subscription
So if I may, let me be clearer - let say my "instance" consisted of: 4 > physical servers (each with 12 cores & 128 GB memory), total 14 VM > machines. > [...] > Do you know of any successive implementation of Akka's routing & load > balancing with numbers close to my above requirements? > We've seen deployments on hundreds of servers in the field and Akka was able to run just fine in there, so I wouldn't be worried about 14 machines :-) Happy hakking! -- Cheers, Konrad 'ktoso' Malawski hAkker @ Typesafe -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
