Hi Leslie, currently materializer is quite lightweight. You do not need to care about performance implications when creating a new one. However in the future this could change where materializer could even become stateful for quicker materialization.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:18 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I could not find anything about the costs for creating an > ActorMaterializer. > Is it a cheap operation so I can have individual materializers per stream > or is it more heavy weight so I should share them between streams? > > Kind Regards, > Leslie Leder > > -- > >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ > >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: > http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html > >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Akka User List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Martynas Mickevičius Typesafe <http://typesafe.com/> – Reactive <http://www.reactivemanifesto.org/> Apps on the JVM -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
