As per the topic: I know that, for example, if I had the following: broadcast ~> Flow[X].flatMapConcat(...) broadcast ~> Flow[X].flatMapConcat(...)
I would need an async boundary to make the two branches run concurrently. How does this work with futures? What happens if I have this? [A] broadcast ~> Flow[X].mapAsync(1)(...) [B] broadcast ~> Flow[X].mapAsync(2)(...) are [A](no par.) and [B](par. 2) run concurrently (total par. 3?) or it's either A(no par.) or B(par. 2) (in any sequential order, ABBAABB etc depending on the demand/availability)? In other words, if either A or B is running, is the stream waiting for the result of the "current" future before processing the other branch? I think maybe this has been discussed before, but I can't find a proper answer... Thank you! -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
