Right -- that's probably the way I would tend to construct something like this, but it would depend on the use case, as well as whether the "groups" in question were mutually exclusive...
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Konrad Malawski < [email protected]> wrote: > > As such, no -- there's no formal "group" concept like this, although you > could construct it manually yourself. > > There is "all children of given actor" which is accessible by > context.children() inside an Actor. > > > > > -- > Konrad `ktoso` Malawski > Akka <http://akka.io> @ Lightbend <http://lightbend.com> > > > On 21 March 2017 at 15:02:26, Justin du coeur ([email protected]) wrote: > -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
