Justin, I wrote your implementation but as a local actor in every node to live in memory as long as the instance is up and running.
I thought about possible border cases regarding to model it as a local actor but I can not come up with a case that would break the scenario. I am thinking about starting with 3 instances (always odd numbers) and in case of a network partition that leaves the cluster with a size of two a second network partition would not be fixed by the split brain resolver and in this case one of those nodes should be Down using the HTTP management. Do you know any border case that would break when using local actors as split brain resolvers? Regards, Sebastian -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
