Ronnie - If my understanding is correct, you can designate one server to be the top-level manager, and you can set up every other manager to connect to that manager as an "intermediate manager". Each application submitted should connect (via however many layers) to the top level manager which then distributes the threads appropriately to all the base level executors.
Take a look at Figure 4a in the following document: http://alchemi.net/files/alchemi_techreport.pdf However, it appears that the ability to do this is disabled in the v1.0.0 release of Alchemi. (Tibor, Krishna, others: What's it going to take to get this working?) Jonathan On 2/9/06, Ronnie LEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If each organisation sets up their own Alchemi installation, how can we > string them up when we want to harness the entire set up? > > ronnie > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > alchemi-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alchemi-users > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ alchemi-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alchemi-users
