Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> But maybe this approach also answers Martin's approach of wanting a 
> different representation for the generated isomorphismTypes. I don't 
> think that is necessary. I like more the approach to consider them as 
> coset representatives.

I want different representations because of efficiency and ease of use and type
safety. I'll check in my new branch

iso-experiments

as soon as I'm well (and Composition works for isomorphismtypes).

Martin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Aldor-combinat-devel mailing list
Aldor-combinat-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aldor-combinat-devel

Reply via email to