Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > just works! So, what I was afraid of is very likely a non-issue! > > Believe it or not, I would have done it in (nearly) the same way.
I'd be curious what you'd have done differently... > But the question for me (and the reason why I have not written that > access stuff from the beginning) is: > Suppose you write a package that takes a species F as input. Now how can > you get access to the internals of that parameter F? You cannot. There is no "generic" representation of a structure. And I don't think that's much of a problem. When playing with a species, I'd guess that you know how it is constructed. Generic stuff - that works always for Plus for example - can be put into Plus. With Aldor, you should be able to "extend" Plus to fit the needs of your "private" problem. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Aldor-combinat-devel mailing list Aldor-combinat-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aldor-combinat-devel
