Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Yes. In Categorial Language, I have functors from the category of multisets
> > with bijections to the category of sets with bijections, I
> > guess.
> 
> Maybe.
> 
> > Unfortunately, BLL use "multiensemble" (in french, what do they use in
> > english?) for something different, namely, a k-tuple of sets.  A 
> > k-multisorted
> > species is a functor from the category of k-tuples of sets and bijections to
> > the category of sets with bijections...
> 
> Ha, it seems you stepped over the same problem as me. ;-) For some time I was
> wondering, why they call something like "k-tuple of sets" a "k-multiset". I
> could not see equal elements. After a while I realized that if you have a
> BLL-multiset U1+U2+...+Uk and factor out any permutations of the components,
> you basically make all elements of U1 equal (same for U2,...,Uk). And that is 
> a
> multiset as we are used to it.

YES! Good remark.

> >> In fact, I would not throw away your code, because basically you
> >> implemented the ground algorithm which must be adapted to
> >> multisort. (Whatever we decide what "multisort" should look like in AC.)

> > I didn't intend to throw away my code. I think it's quite ok. And in fact,
> > very likely we will need - to generate isomorphismtypes of compositions of
> > multisorted species - functors from the category of k-tuples of multisets
> > to the category of sets...
> 
> Rather, a multisort species M is a functor M: B^k -> B. (k-tuples of "sets",
> not "multisets")

Yes, but:

to generate isomorphismtypes of unisort species I need to be able to produce
structures with labels from a (usual) multiset.

It is highly unlikely that this is not necessary for multisort species. Thus,
we really need functors

MultiSet^k -> B

(It is "highly unlikely", since for k=1 we have the current situation. However,
it may well be the case that I overlooked something and composition can be done
without considering multisets. On the other hand, this generalisation looks
quite interesting to me!)

> How does M: B^k -> B look like to you?

I don't understand this question.

Martin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Aldor-combinat-devel mailing list
Aldor-combinat-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aldor-combinat-devel

Reply via email to