> In any case, this should be convincing evidence to write p_i instead of x_i > and > interpret the cycle index series as a symmetric function.
You are probably not saying that instead of x you want to use the letter p instead. That would be ridiculous. As you have shown, one only has to take the CIS, substitute for the x_i some symmetric polynomials and voila, you get what you want. Why is that so problematic? As I understand BLL, we should rather consider (extend AC to) weighted species. That is how you get your substitutions. Am I wrong? Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Aldor-combinat-devel mailing list Aldor-combinat-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aldor-combinat-devel
