on 1/31/01 5:07 AM, "Jeff Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to think that I'm open minded enough to consider any suggestions
> and using sourceforge is not a bad suggestion
There are strong reasons to not stick your valuable software and hard work
into a solution that may or may not be around next year.
>, but I don't quite see the
> need to it. We have CVS, we have a mailing lists, we have a web site. I
> don't actually think that we need anything more at this point and I
> personally wouldn't want to split any of the project across two areas.
>
> If there are thing you think we should be doing to help manage the project
> let us know. My personal favourite would be an Apache Wiki but that's one
> for the ASF to handle.
>
> P.S. I have been meaning to use sourceforge for opening some of the code
> that's floating around on my hard drive, but that's a different story.
The short answer is that we will eventually be using Sourcecast technologies
and not Sourceforge and the Sourcecast software will be hosted by
apache.org.
@see <http://www.collab.net/>
thanks,
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
