John Morrison wrote: > > Sam, which do you think would be better: > > 1) Allowing download access to the cvs and base directories or > 2) tar(gz)/zip the cvs, base directory(s) and jars it depends > on for download? > > I can't do 1 (although this would be quickest...) but I'm willing > to have a shot at the xsl for 2. # 2. The machine on which the build is done is not necessarily the machine on which to serve the downloads. In fact, with the runs I do, they are not. I would like to retain the ability to do builds without posting the results, so I would like to see those two be separate scripts. The way I would suggest to proceed is to initially hand code the scripts and then examine the results. I've learned a lot about what truly is in common between subprojects and what is different along the way so far, and at this moment in time, I'm not sure I can rightly predict what such a script would look like. An example of a variation - jakarta-ant's build has a distribution target which builds the tars and zips already. Others will need this to be done as an afterstep. I've promised a few subprojects that I would start posting daily builds for them. I'll start it manually, and post the results here as a seed to the discussion. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
