on 3/24/01 12:36 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John has been submitting a steady stream of good patches and suggestions
> against the current Gump code base, and Scott has implemented a closely
> related variation with a different (almost an extreme programming flavor)
> vision and implementation, but keeping closely to the data definitions that
> make these family of proposals common. There already is significant signs
> of code stealing between these proposals.
>
> So, let me start off with a +1 each for Jon and Scott...
^ John
> - Sam Ruby
+1 to both.
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
