On 8/22/01 12:57 AM, "Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To summarize, I am indeed willing to try and work together - I mean I
>> did initiate by trying to figure out what Gump needs and
>> tailoring JJAR
>> to provide that.
>>
>> However, I tend to be a minimalist, and wonder if Gump would be better
>> off depending on another dedicated tool to provide the
>> services that it
>> needs wrt dependencies.
>>
> AntGump was looking to use this exact thing (external dependency engine
> ala CJAN/JJAR).
I think the dep engine and this whole issue are not the same thing. As a
matter of fact the dep engine in JJAR is the direct result of me asking for
it so that I could use it for Gump so that it could provide all dependency
information.
> Whether the info comes from one repo or another doesn't really matter to
> me, although I would like to see some common DTD for the base
> information.
I think a DTD/Schema for a project's overall information would be much more
beneficial than carving it up. It really isn't that much information.
>
>> Off to Montana. Big sky. No broadband.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Scott Sanders
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
