Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> I still think the project/target model is still more appropriate as I was
> going to suggest that descriptors like the commons descriptor should be
> separated into their respective projects. What's listed in the commons
> descriptor is really a set of separate projects.
>
> I'll put the DTD for a project in the repository in a couple minutes. I
> would definitely like to hack this out.
I'd still like to do one checkout/update for jakarta-commons. As long as
that can be accomodated, I'm willing to go with the flow.
I must say that I really, really, really am trying to map to the way that
people organize THEIR stuff, instead of forcing the mapping to the way that
you or I may happen to think about things. Just because you find xalan,
commons, and a few other projects weird isn't a reason to mis-model them,
IMHO. ;-)
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
