Good finding ! However, I'm using IE 6.0.2600.0000 (the released version)
and it should understand PRE tags, shouldn't it ?
I can't believe it .... If I go to
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/jakarta-cactus-23.html , do a
view source, the line is " [java] [junit] expected:<this is a
response cookie> but was:<this+is+a+response+cookie>". Now if I do a "save
as ..." to save the file locally on my computer and then have a look at the
HTML, the line becomes : " [java] [junit] expected:<THIS cookie
response a is> but was:<THIS+IS+A+RESPONSE+COOKIE>"
There is some magic involve that I don't understand ...
Thanks
-Vincent
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 2:10 AM
Subject: Re: [gump][cactus] cactus-23 build failures
> Vincent Massol wrote:
> >
> > I have succeeded in reproducing the build error. However, what's funny
is
> > that GUMP reports the following error :
> >
> > [java] [junit] Testcase: testReceiveCookie took 0.156 sec
> > [java] [junit] FAILED
> > [java] [junit] expected: but was:
> > [java] [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:
but was:
>
> It took me a while to figure this one out. In your browser, try
> view->source.
>
> I'll change from <PRE> tags to <XMP> tags, which while deprecated and
> obsolete, still appear to work with IE6, NN6,
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
