Jason van Zyl wrote: > > I see the note mentioning that turbine2 and turbine3 cannot exist on the > same classpath: would a recommended approach be to adjust the package names > in turbine3 to something like org.apache.turbinex. The decouple torque and > fulcrum code doesn't cause a problem but the core code left in turbine3 > definitely collides. > > While we're in alpha so the change won't hurt now if that is a strategy that > would be helpful.
I guess that would be one path. One that makes it marginally harder for people to upgrade from Turbine 2 to Turbine 3. Another would be to actually provide a smooth upgrade path from Turbine 2 to Turbine 3. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
