Jon Stevens wrote: > >>>> 1) gump has no way of distinguishing between jakarta-site2 (which has no >>>> java code but a build.xml) from modules which contain java code. >>> >>> Resolved. >>> >>> Not quite. The list produced is the inverse of >>> http://nagoya.apache.org/~rubys/gump/javadoc.html . > > I don't get what you are saying. You asked for a javadocs target, I gave one > to you. Just because it doesn't actually produce javadocs shouldn't be an > error should it? :-)
I am merely stating that the ability of gump to distiguish between jakarta-site2 from modules which contain java code is not resolved. I didn't request anything, nor did I say it would be an error if it wasn't present. I merely noted that my heuristics for constructing my list of projects to investigate further was imperfect. You might be able to infer a request from the following: > 2) the project may contain a target to build javadocs, but not a target > which will build both javadocs and a jar. If so, the request would have been for a target which builds javadocs, not one named javadoc. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
