On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 23:49, Sam Ruby wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > Well, part of getting Maven rolling was to separate all the turbine bits > > and use Maven to help with the Gump problems. All the pieces in stratum > > are going to have separate builds as they will be separate components in > > the commons so I will start with the mapper. > > > > How are we going to deal with what is a circular dep for Gump? Stratum > > needs to be built before Maven can work and Stratum will need to be > > built with Maven :-) I think you will have to consider Maven a binary > > jar that you don't have the sources for. That's how I plan to deploy it, > > as a single JAR will all that's required to work and I'm going to > > slightly mangle the internal linkage (by one character so people can > > debug) so that it won't interfere with anything else on the classpath. > > Help with the Gump problems? EXCUSE ME? GUMP PROBLEMS?
I didn't intend to misrepresent the problem. When I say Gump problems I mean it in the sense that Gump objectives are not being met in that the HEADs won't build. Gump is just a tool, there's nothing wrong with Gump itself. > > I can jump up and down, scream and shout, and send daily nags. What do I > get in return? A suggestion that perhaps I should decrease the frequency > with which such runs are made. Now you are misrepresenting what I was saying. I told you how often I would run builds that used HEAD. That as a pragmatic aspect of development that's how often I check. > Grrr.... > > - Sam Ruby > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
