Sam > >If so, it looks like they are in the process of changing an interface that >you depend on. > Ahh that could be it.
>>Could someone advise me what to do re this jar to stop the gump >>failures? I have tried masking the classes out using <available> but >>that does not seem to work. >> > >The beepcore classes are available, or at least some version of them. >Have you talked to the authors of the beepcore package about this? > Yes, we are in dialog. They seemed surprised when we reported that our test suite only performs at 10% of its throughput with beep versus without. I'll get the latest download. - Paul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
