> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > John Morrison wrote: > > > > we still might go over 16... :( > > If so, give priority to the failures. And then to the ones earlier in the > list. They already are sorted so that they projects people most depend on > are first. I would certainly focus more on an ant failure than a > smoketest > failure. On the other hand, the few times that Ant fails, there tends to > only be *ONE* failure that day. ;-)
I suppose the ones which change from success to fail should be listed, then the ones which have failed least times then... J. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
