Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Those that don't will no longer have binaries posted. > > Sounds fine. Do you think the approach I've described is good enough > or am I missing some subtle point. I know that I didn't take care of > GUMP logs for example.
The approach you described is a step forward. I know of no subtle points that you are missing. Don't worry, I'll take care of any loose ends. What is likely to occur is that I'll pick nagoya (which has much space available) to start posting binaries. For a brief period of time, both sets will be available, and then I'll start removing entries from my separately maintained script. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
