On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:45, Sam Ruby wrote:
> <nudge> <nudge> You know, I'm not so sure I am so thrilled about this
> experiment in allowing projects to house their own gump descriptors.
personally I think it is fantastic atm - as long as those projects monitor
changes in gump (and as soon as we get mailouts controlled by descriptor).
I think the real problems will occur due to namespace issues. What if
excalibur defines a product that has a name that clashes with something in
maven or whatever. Even worse will be the security issues brought about my
automatic deployment. ie Avalon should only be able to create nightlys in
it's own directory. XDoclet should not be able to get nighlies distributed
from jakarta by changing its descriptor - nor should it be able to mess with
anyones website.
>It
> would have been nice if Avalon's had been made to work before they were
> moved,
I was waiting for the first gump run that wasn't all yellow. Unfortunately
none of the recent runs seem to have been working and thus I never got around
to fixing them ;)
> --- /tmp/gump/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/gump.xml Sun Mar 17 06:16:33 2002
> +++ jakarta-avalon-excalibur.xml Sun Mar 17 14:30:45 2002
patch applied.
--
Cheers,
Pete
---------------------------------------------
We shall not cease from exploration, and the
end of all our exploring will be to arrive
where we started and know the place for the
first time -- T.S. Eliot
---------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
