Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > castor-test is failing since a few nights because it now depends on > AdaptX (exolab's non-TraX XSLT processor, sequel to XSL:P). > > AdaptX has been around since several months now (they asked us to > support it in Ant) but still doesn't even have a website of its own. > On the other hand, no other project depends on castor-test. > > I have a definition of AdaptX almost working on my machine (still > testing a little) - should I commit it or should we remove > castor-test?
Do what you think is best. I'm OK with either approach. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
