Jason van Zyl wrote: > > I don't mind a descriptor for an installed package. I just don't like > having to replicate the <project name="x" package="y"/> entries in each > of the profiles. I just wanted to put all these entries in a single file > and reference them from the profile.
Short term suggestion: call it a profile and lets update the workspaces to reference two profiles each. My original thoughts were that profile owners would want to control what version of JDBC, etc they used, but I recognize that this is a tradeoff. > Isn't it ok if we didn't do it in public, or could we get permission as > we're only moving things between a handful of machines. Or we could call > it the Gump binary distribution :-) I definately want to encourage more people to consider using this infrastructure. And I certainly wouldn't want to touch the license for jsse, for example. >> How does this sound? > > Sounds good to me. Cool. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
