dIon Gillard wrote: > > any objection to me changing the 'from' name for Maven generated > descriptors to 'Maven Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' ? > Since, if there's anything wrong with the descriptor, that's the best > place to report it?
At the moment, that may seem wise, but will it scale? Once Maven stabilizes and gets even a fraction of the usage of Ant, will the maven-dev development list still be the most likely place to look for assistance? In any case, experiment and see what's best. Thought experiment: what happens when there is a change to Maven needed? How can you be sure that it doesn't adversely impact the various projects which use maven? Wouldn't it be nice if the various gump related files which were generated by Maven could be regenerated as a part of the Gump run instead of using possibly stale versions from cvs? What changes to Maven and/or Gump would be required to make this work? - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
