On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The general assumption is that work directories are initially empty > and populated during the course of this build.
So there is no need to put them at the front of the CLASSPATH. > The way to reference pre-existing jars is to define them as a > project and depend on it I know. > > What would I break if I reversed the order? I could and will > > try, but maybe I'm missing something. > > I'm not sure. I've run a complete jakarta Gump build (my personal Ant 1.5_BRANCH testbed) with a patched build.xsl that puts the jars from <depend> in front of the <work> entries. Everything worked as well/bad as before. I'll follow this for some more days and eventually commit the patch. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
