Sam Ruby wrote:
Right, good point. I do tend to have those hanging around :-)No, it means that you have something extra: a prebuilt version of ant. ;-)
In the end, this might be a reasonable approach - the generated scripts don't rely on that prebuilt Ant, just the script generation phase. Really, it comes down to a maintenance issue (Keeping gen.sh and build.xml's gen target in sync). I think I know your preference but for Gump newbies, this might be an easier road.
OK, path separator is at least one issue. I won't have access to a windows box for another week (I'm on leave at the moment - hooray) so I'll try to sort it out then.Works for me on linux, fails on windows. Here's the -verbose output:This doesn't make any sense to me...
>
> I sure hope that gump's build.xml doesn't ever rely on new features that
> are added to ant...
>
It seems as if the above two statements (which I have juxtaposed) are contradictory. Is it OK for Gump's build.xml to use unreleased Ant features?
... cool! And since I always bootstrap and then use the latest version of ant, this won't cause me any problems. ;-)
Conor
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
