I was in the garage earlier and took a look at a Champion N11y (I think).


The ground lead extended beyond the electrode ever so slightly.  The ground
lead was also no wider than the electrode.  Meaning, there would be slightly
more clearance in a fore/aft orientation than if the open side of the plug was
facing a valve.



In a fore/aft orientation, youbve got maximum clearance with the valves, and
you donbt have any electrode in the line of fire of the intake valve.  I can
see how a plug thatbs bfacingb the exhaust side might interrupt the
intake flow, but I canbt see how a plug facing fore/aft would interrupt
anything.



Ibll continue to orient my plugs fore/aft in my big valve motor, and ignore
it altogether in everything else.



bs



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 3:45 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [alfa] Re: Spark plug indexing washers, how thick?



Hi Brian,
I'm really most interested in the plug electrode not hitting the big intake
valve. If I look into the spark plug hole, I can definitely see the intake
valve, not so the exhaust valve, but that said, I'll look again. Presuming I
can't see the exhaust valve, then I could theoretically place the gap toward
the intake valve and the electrode would not contact the exhaust valve. I'm
not expecting any measurable performance gain, but hypothetically, there is an
optimum position for the gap postioning. My copy of Ricardo's "The High Speed
Internal Combustion Engine" is in storage, so I can't check that to see if he
has anything to say on the subject. The only way to test this for sure, would
be to do a series of dyno tests and that's not in the budget.

If I use the plugs that require indexing, the hypothetical questions have only
to do with optimization of what I have to do anyway. Presuming the prime
directive is to not have the side electrode at 90 degrees facing toward the
intake valve, it would seem the gap could be anywhere from 90 degrees to the
valve (in line with the crank shaft) to the 180 positions (perpendicular to
the crank shaft) or at 45 dgrees to the intake valve, with the electrode
toward the exhaust valve. The almost purely intellectual question is: Is there
a particular orientation that is better for combustion? I would think that an
unmasked spark, in an Alfa combustion chamber with a flat top 10:1 piston
should be pointing toward the center of the combustion chamber for best
ignition. Even if this hypothesis is correct, I expect little practical value
from it, that said, is ther a theoretical optimum?

So! Now I've just called NGK technical. The guy said they recommend straight
up and down with the open part toward the center of the combustion chamber, OR
up to 30 dgrees toward the exhaust valve. He commented that this might get you
1% more power, which on a 500 hp motor is 5 hp. The other thing was the BP7ET
3 electrode plug. This has the same extension as the BP7ES, but are not
available in the USA.

Anybody know where I can buy some?

Stevan Thomas
73 Berlina





In a message dated 7/12/2010 11:21:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:




>I have a big valve head, so I have to index if I use the extended nose plugs.
One of the things I've heard mentioned, is that indexing allows you to >orient
the electrode/gap so as to allow the best combustion. Agreeing that the
orientation should be 180 dgrees off the oversize intake valve, left to >my
own devices, I would tend to put the open space toward the center of the
combustion chamber. Does that make sense?



If you buy into the notion that indexing is going to gain you some performance
(Ibm not sure I do, or that it would be noticeable), then I think itbs
contradictory to where youbd want to index things to avoid valve contact.



Indexing for performance would seem to indicate that you want the gap facing
towards the intake valve.  Or, as Ken suggests, facing away from the intake
valve.  Flip a coin as to which is best for an Alfa motor.  Then toss both of
them to the wind, because indexing them that way will maximize the chances
that youbll contact the valves.  To avoid contact with the valves, you want
the plugs indexed for/aft.



Personally, I think youbre worrying too much over something that wonbt
make any difference youbd ever notice.  And as Les says, if you did index
them boptimallyb, but the spaces moved the plug that much further back
from the combustion chamber, would you still reap the benefits?



On my big valve Spider, I mark the plugs, then shuffle them around so I get
the best combination of fore/aft orientation to void valve interference.



On every other Alfa I own, I donbt bother with any of the above.



bs
--
to be removed from alfa, see http://www.digest.net/bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]

Reply via email to