> I'd like you guys to hold off automating downloads from anduin where
you can for the present. However, if there is a problem package or two,
by all means, use it.
>
Is there still any objection against changing the download urls in the
blfs profile to use anduin?
Currently there are a lot of dead links in our url-lists (and apart from
For those packages that have dead links and we can't find them
elsewhere, I would say we could point them to anduin based on what Bruce
stated above.
those dead links, it also seems that ftp.gnome.org is down) and that
ftp.gnome.org is working fine for me.
--
Thomas
LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329
warpcore - Powered by: Linux 2.6.10-gentoo-r6
21:12:00 up 5 days, 8:30, 6 users, load average: 0.09, 0.16, 0.13
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
