On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 22:11 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was wondering if this might be a better fit then > <execute command="sed"> > <PARAM>-e '[EMAIL PROTECTED](^CROSS_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR =\)[EMAIL PROTECTED] > /tools/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'</param> > <param>-i gcc/Makefile.in</param> > </execute> > > I see you have it slightly differently why put -i by its self? and no -e? i > see its a cross compile insted of hlfs but was wondering. > <execute command="sed"> > <param>-i</param> > <param>"[EMAIL PROTECTED](^CROSS_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR =\)[EMAIL PROTECTED] > /tools/[EMAIL PROTECTED]"</param> > <param>gcc/Makefile.in</param> > </execute> > There's no -e because it's not in the cross-lfs book, as for the -i being seperate, that's kind of personal preference, but also helps seperate each parameter so it doesn't become a big jumble.
-- Thomas LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329 kitt - Powered by: Linux 2.6.11 14:28:11 up 2 min, 1 user, load average: 0.42, 0.21, 0.08
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
