El Martes, 13 de Septiembre de 2005 23:37, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > I don't think there necessarily would be need to make a new xsl, unless > I'm misuderstanding what you mean. jhalfs can just be changed to use and > process the current commands differently.
To place "#! /bin/bash" at the top of each file and "&&" at the end of each commands block is very easy using XSL, for example. My point is that some of the hacking required could be achieved changing the XSL output. The question is to know what is the output actually required, see what can be done with the XSL, what will require code in the jhalfs script, and what could to depend on changes on the book sources (and discuss if that theorical book's changes are aceptable). -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
