On 11/23/05, Tapio Kelloniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not recommend XML since it is clumsy for humans to > read and write. IMHO I never found xml clumsy. Infact I find it more easier than traditional scripts and programs as you don't have much chance to goof up the things if you use correct indentation. > Also I think that users should be free from > XML which means that they should only need to edit easy configuration > files (name=value), but preferably users can be presented with something > like Linux's menuconfig (if it is appropriate for the choosen UI). The menu config thing is good but the tree structure of xml is very similar isn't it?
I would prefer to go for C and xml. But so far I hadn't figured out how the communication part uses xml. Is it that we have the server hold the xml files and use client as some kind of xml browser? -- ╔════════════════════════════╗ ║I don't know how much of what I say is true ║ ╚════════════════════════════╝
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
